Why Not? Explaining Missing Entailments with Evee (Technical Report)

Christian AlrabbaaChristian Alrabbaa, Stefan BorgwardtStefan Borgwardt, Tom FrieseTom Friese, Patrick KoopmannPatrick Koopmann, Mikhail KotlovMikhail Kotlov

Christian Alrabbaa, Stefan Borgwardt, Tom Friese, Patrick Koopmann, Mikhail Kotlov
Why Not? Explaining Missing Entailments with Evee (Technical Report)
Technical Report, arXiv.org, volume CoRR abs/2308.07294, 2023

Details
Bibtex

KurzfassungAbstract
Understanding logical entailments derived by a description logic reasoner is not always straight-forward for ontology users. For this reason, various methods for explaining entailments using justifications and proofs have been developed and implemented as plug-ins for the ontology editor Protégé. However, when the user expects a missing consequence to hold, it is equally important to explain why it does not follow from the ontology. In this paper, we describe a new version of EVEE, a Protégé plugin that now also provides explanations for missing consequences, via existing and new techniques based on abduction and counterexamples.
Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Wissensbasierte SystemeKnowledge-Based Systems

@techreport{ABFKK2023,
  author      = {Christian Alrabbaa and Stefan Borgwardt and Tom Friese and
                 Patrick Koopmann and Mikhail Kotlov},
  title       = {Why Not? Explaining Missing Entailments with Evee (Technical
                 Report)},
  institution = {arXiv.org},
  year        = {2023}
}